Hacking The Covid Cult
How to disrupt the inner workings of the Covid Cult? How to behave in the mythical world of semi-gods Fauci, Marks and Walensky and others? Remeber religous people do like when You know their gods?
I have recently met a Jewish couple from Chicago in Prague Jewish Community, who were clearly Democrats, clearly still believers of the governmental narrative:
א Vaccines are safe and effective.
ב Corelation does not mean causation.
ג There is no proof that vaccines cause any adverse events.
ד If any adverse event is observed, it is just a coincidence, except for minor ones, that prove vaccines indeed work as expected.
When entering their space, I soon realized, I know their semi-gods better then they do, which is not that hard, since they have been converted to their new religion without even relizing it simply by taking the “reasonable to believe”1 jab. They of course did know Michelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci, but did not know Peter Marks, Janet Woodcock and were completely unaware about rezignations of Marion F. Gruber and Phil Krause.
When challenged about these personal decisions in FDA pantheon, they were kind of confused.
As a complete stranger coming to the believers, I did not expect to convince them instantly. After all everyone is responsible for his own believes, axioms, assumptions and/or premises.
They asserted, there was a consensus among physicians.
I challenged that claiming there is literally a law dispute concerning the evidence on these whatever-it-is (be it jabs or vaccines) and the FDA wanted to hide the evidence from the public for as long as 75 years, which is exactly the oposite of a consensus. FDA was then proned by The Federal Judge Mark Pittman to releese the documents . Moreover the authorities had to admit myocarditis and blood clots as the adverse events and even something that seems as ouright lies on vaccine efficacy. Certainly it was not better then relative risk reduction of 2/3 and absolute risk reduction two severe cases in 22000, since there were 3 severe cases among placebo group and 1 among “fully vaccinated.”
They said their mantra about 95 percent effective (as expected).
”For a mild disease,” I said. They noded.
”OK, but no one jabs for a mild disease. It is relative risk reduction 2/3 and absolute risk reduction 2:22000 for severe cases. But there was a fully vaccinated severe case of covid in the study. Moreover taking the jab means taking the risks as well, like Maddie De Garay, who was completely healthy before, now wheelchair bound after the second jab, or Jacob Clynick, who again was healthy boy before, but died few days after the second jab.”
This kind of forced them to climb on the fence and look with a confused smirk to the other side of the fence - the “What if they were lying to us all the time?” side of the fence.
Now our time was exhausted, we were talking on shabbat night till almost 10 p. m.
I do not feel confortable to push anyone forcefully to the other side of the fence anyway, but I kind of liked the idea exposing the three letter agencies pantheon to proud American Democrats.
Another conversation I had with a thirteen year old, who was adviced by his mother (a physician and a friend of mine) not to take the shot, but was convinced to take it anyway. The conversation started with an advice from a rabbi: “Take the shot. Take the shot. I was in a hospital with covid and it was terrible. Take the shot.” The rabbi, also friend of mine, behaves usually as a smart guy, but was apparently blindsided by a constant pressure from the state, that expected him to market the vaccine.
We just went through the town and the young man explained to me his view. “If only we all took the vaccine, the pandemic is over.”
”Well, that’s not going to happen, me and your mother, we are apperently not going to take it, there were people in the clinical study, who did take it and got covid anyway, there was even serious case in a fully vaccinated participant…”
”That’s just 5 percent, but the 95 are safe.”
”Well, 5 percent is still one in twenty, that is 50 thousend people just in Prague, that is enough to keep the virus spreading and evolving. And moreover rats are not going to take it.”
”Yeah, but I need to do my part to slow the spread and flatten the curve,” said the young man.
”You know what, in Your age, there is actually more chance, You end up in hospital with a heart inflamation after the jab then that you end up in hospital with covid.”
”But I don’t want to be a potential spreader,” said the young man.
”This jab cannot guaratee you, that you won’t become a spreader. Actually two weeks after every jab it is more likely. But I do appreciate your extreme altruism, that reduces every value of you as a young man into the potential not to spread this specific virus. Even so, with this extreme altruism, if you do catch heart inflamation, what are you going to say? Please do not help me? I do not want to grab a hospital bed? Who is going to listen to you? They would get you to hospital anyway. And moreover you mother, because she loves you, would make sure to do anything to save you.”
It was only when the young man realized his altruism may actually make things worse, that he became aware of the option not to take the jab, may be actually better not only for him, but also for humanity.
Speaking with the people of the Corona cult may be challenging, going into details can certainly help, as does exploration of individual beliefs, that brought the participant to the cult in he first place.
More on this metaphysical and religious point in the next posts.
“... it is reasonable to believe that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) may be effective ...” A quote from Marion F. Gruber EUA for Pfizer.